If you read my post and you understand it you will note I made NO mention of money or the ability to afford one.Hmmm… “have to be able”, see there… that’s the rub. If you’d said: “I guess you have to own one to understand“, you’d at least sound relatable.
I am perfectly able to afford as Many Gibson’s as I might like… I have owned a few, did not bond with any of them, even though (all but one feature on one of them) all were made perfectly well, they did not seem worth the cost to me, and they went back (not one made it past the return window). I’m glad you like yours, but don’t assume that if someone doesn’t have them, they can’t afford them Mr Howell.
View attachment 239236
But what about them stealing Fender's designs?Good for them, for protecting their designs.
I think Fender should make everyone stop making their design. But if Fender doesn’t care, than Gibson and all the others will continue. Why would they stop if they don’t have to?But what about them stealing Fender's designs?
![]()
I think Fender should make everyone stop making their design. But if Fender doesn’t care, than Gibson and all the others will continue. Why would they stop if they don’t have to?
I think Fender should make everyone stop making their design. But if Fender doesn’t care, than Gibson and all the others will continue. Why would they stop if they don’t have to?
Fender and others created the conditions that hurt their brand
You remind me of a conversation that I had with a former Gibson emplyee a few years ago.I don’t get the impression that people are ripping on Gibson for its own sake. They make a (generally) good quality guitar. That’s a given. I’ve owned several and I still have my ‘72 SG. It’s great. Literally worlds better than any recent SG I’ve played, btw, but so what? The point is there are lots of guitars that can go head to head with Gibson. Gibson fanboys don’t want to admit that but it’s a fact. Especially today, when the playing field is 1,000% more level than say 30-40 years ago. Again, that doesn’t mean Gibson sucks. But are they overpriced? In my opinion they are (and I can certainly afford one). Has their quality control declined? Not just a few have said as much. Is their lawsuit rife with hypocrisy? In my opinion it absolutely is.
I don’t know. I don’t hate Gibson. I just don’t Iove them unconditionally. Nor do I with Fender either.
I wonder if this is the end for the Michael Schenker V produced by Dean![]()
How do they work the shipping charge ?![]()
Dean Michael Schenker Electric Guitar - shopgoodwill.com
Dean Michael Schenker Electric Guitar We do not offer pick-ups..Brand:DeanModel:Michael SchenkerType:Electric GuitarUPC:N/ASerial Number:O06103627Color:Black & WhiteDescription:Dean Michael Schenker Electric GuitarApprox. Dimensions:17x2x45 inCondition:Powers on in brief testing. Not fully...shopgoodwill.com
I don't think Fender suffers in the slightest bit from the profusion of cheap Strat copies, any more than Gibson does from the profusion of cheap LP and SG copies. I think it's the opposite. Those guitars help them. Kids who grow up playing cheap imitations are more likely to want to graduate to the real thing when they can. It's what they're used to, but better. No one will say "I have an SX, don't need an American Standard Strat now."I think Fender should make everyone stop making their design. But if Fender doesn’t care, than Gibson and all the others will continue. Why would they stop if they don’t have to?
you can calculate the shipping before you bidHow do they work the shipping charge ?
Do they use a specific shipper ?