Fender® Squier® Guitar and Bass Forum

Go Back   Fender® Squier® Guitar and Bass Forum > Other Discussion Forums > Other Guitars

Notices

Other Guitars Non-Squier guitar discussion fits nicely in the "Other Guitars" forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-04-2010, 06:47 PM   #1 (permalink)
Squier-holic
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Pflugerville, TX
Posts: 1,176
Default GuitarFetish.com kits

Anyone bought and assembled one?

Specifically the "set neck" kits like the Flying V and Explorer?

I've always wanted one (or three) of each of those... but haven't wanted to pay the $$$ for a Gibson or even a good knockoff like an Epiphone (have an Epiphone SG and LP).

I noticed the pics on the guitarfetish.com site show what appear to be bolt-on kits, but the text specifically says they are glue-in set necks. The pics look like stock photos though, so I am thinking the pics aren't really exactly what you are going to get.

I imagine these kits will need finish sanding and of course sealing and finishing... anyone know how well they are done? Is it a lot of work to finish one or are they pretty close to being ready to spray as they come?

softwarejanitor is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Ads   #
Sponsored posting
 
 
Join Date: March, 2003
Location: Forum HQ
Posts: N/A
Sponsored by...

Google is online  
Old 06-04-2010, 07:04 PM   #2 (permalink)
Squier Talker
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 28
Default

That Flying V does show a bolt on neck but the explorer is definitely set neck. You just have to glue the neck yourself, which is a daunting task if you've never done that before
Don Tonberry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 07:11 PM   #3 (permalink)
Squier-Meister
 
shrekfingers's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 468
Default

That is weird, they show a bolt on neck for the V but say in the description that it is a set neck, that you glue it in. Email and ask I am sure they'll tell ya, they look pretty kewl if you have the talent and patience.
shrekfingers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 07:26 PM   #4 (permalink)
Squier-holic
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sioux City
Age: 45
Posts: 1,297
Default

Save your money. They aren't worth it. Every piece that comes with them has to be replaced and theres a good chance the holes wont line up. I have built 2 guitars from the kits and i did get them to play alright i had to invest another $400 on new parts. Your money would be well spent somewhere else.
Also, If you are planning a kit with the set neck. you really need to be an experienced woodworker. They are very tricky and require a lot of wood skills. Trust me on that one. Something I don't have If I were to do another one I would do a cheap strat or tele kit but then again a Walmart First Act is a better quality guitar
dannyvawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 09:08 PM   #5 (permalink)
Squier-holic
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Pflugerville, TX
Posts: 1,176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Tonberry View Post
That Flying V does show a bolt on neck but the explorer is definitely set neck.
The part that confuses me about the Explorer is there is a Fender style neck plate and four neck bolts shown in the picture... The Explorer body they show at least doesn't have holes drilled for the neck bolts like the one in the Flying V pics though.

Quote:
You just have to glue the neck yourself, which is a daunting task if you've never done that before
I haven't, but I've done quite a few other woodworking projects. The only really scary part to me is making sure the neck angle is correct before gluing it.
softwarejanitor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 09:12 PM   #6 (permalink)
Squier-holic
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Pflugerville, TX
Posts: 1,176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyvawn View Post
Save your money. They aren't worth it. Every piece that comes with them has to be replaced and theres a good chance the holes wont line up. I have built 2 guitars from the kits and i did get them to play alright i had to invest another $400 on new parts. Your money would be well spent somewhere else.
Also, If you are planning a kit with the set neck. you really need to be an experienced woodworker. They are very tricky and require a lot of wood skills. Trust me on that one. Something I don't have If I were to do another one I would do a cheap strat or tele kit but then again a Walmart First Act is a better quality guitar
Wow... that bad? I thought the price was a little on the low side, but I've generally been favorably impressed with everything I've bought from GuitarFetish.com so far... I hope a few more people who've built them weigh in...
softwarejanitor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 09:24 PM   #7 (permalink)
Squier-holic
 
motoman45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: portland
Age: 51
Posts: 1,890
Default

ill have to agree, for the money you can find alot of axes that will satisfy
__________________
Pic Whore....
motoman45 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2010, 10:17 AM   #8 (permalink)
Squier-holic
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sioux City
Age: 45
Posts: 1,297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by softwarejanitor View Post
Wow... that bad? I thought the price was a little on the low side, but I've generally been favorably impressed with everything I've bought from GuitarFetish.com so far... I hope a few more people who've built them weigh in...
Yeah , that bad. 1 was from GFS and 1 was from a company on Ebay but were made by the same company. I guess my standards must be too high though because I think MOST things bought from GFS is not what I would consider an upgrade. I do like their blocks though. But thats just my opinion. They are doing just fine without me.
dannyvawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2010, 11:43 PM   #9 (permalink)
Squier-Nut
 
Stratatattat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: US
Age: 28
Posts: 610
Default

i came close to getting 1 of those kits...but i'm picky on the bridges and the pups. so i didn't wanna stick another fortune into it. you're better off finding a beater on fleabay and restoring/modding it. that's my 2 cents.
__________________
Axes: Meg's Marmanocaster (formally a Squier SE), Epi Les Paul Standard, Partscaster, Fender Acoustic, '69 Teisco E-110 Tulip, '11 Squier Bullet, '11 Squier Cyclone
Amps: Mustang I, Danelectro Honeytone
Mod the livin' crap out of it!!
Stratatattat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2010, 12:32 AM   #10 (permalink)
Squier-Nut
 
wickedtools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: west texas
Age: 56
Posts: 575
Default

That bad hmmm, I did a tele kit and I used almost all the parts that came with it, some I upgraded as I do on the Squiers. It was the light weight body and it plays and sounds great.
wickedtools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2010, 05:55 PM   #11 (permalink)
Squier-Nut
 
Stratatattat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: US
Age: 28
Posts: 610
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wickedtools View Post
That bad hmmm, I did a tele kit and I used almost all the parts that came with it, some I upgraded as I do on the Squiers. It was the light weight body and it plays and sounds great.
ooh that turned out beautiful!
__________________
Axes: Meg's Marmanocaster (formally a Squier SE), Epi Les Paul Standard, Partscaster, Fender Acoustic, '69 Teisco E-110 Tulip, '11 Squier Bullet, '11 Squier Cyclone
Amps: Mustang I, Danelectro Honeytone
Mod the livin' crap out of it!!
Stratatattat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2010, 07:14 PM   #12 (permalink)
Squier-holic
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sioux City
Age: 45
Posts: 1,297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wickedtools View Post
That bad hmmm, I did a tele kit and I used almost all the parts that came with it, some I upgraded as I do on the Squiers. It was the light weight body and it plays and sounds great.
Thats great yours is good because I said and I quote. "If I were to do another one I would do a cheap strat or tele kit". The ones that I did were set neck and thats what I thought we were talking about. The quality on mine were horrendous but i'm an amateur and probably did something wrong. And the kits that have pauwlonia for a body? If you even look at that wood wrong it will scar. Might as well have a guitar made of pine.
dannyvawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2010, 09:37 PM   #13 (permalink)
Squier-Nut
 
wickedtools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: west texas
Age: 56
Posts: 575
Default

Well I didn't mean any bad by it, just that the hardware is as good as the lower end Squiers and I thought that those set necks would be like the the lower end Epi's. I thought the same thing on the pauwlonia body when I first picked it up but it sure was easy to work with. It turn out durable, has good tone and the best thing I like about it, it's light and easy on the old back.

wickedtools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2010, 10:06 PM   #14 (permalink)
Squier-holic
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sioux City
Age: 45
Posts: 1,297
Default

Glad it works. I eventually got mine to play good but everything needed replaced and I put so much into them I could have bought nice guitars. Getting the necks straight was pure hell and pretty much all of the pre drilled holes were not aligned. On those pauwlonia bodies, the wood is so soft than eventually the screws will just fall out. I have had 2 cheap Deans that after 6 months or so everything stripped out. The necks on those $99 Vendettas are phenomenal, reminiscent of a mid 80's Charvel but the bodies go to crap real fast. They are light though and surprisingly have a good tone.
dannyvawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2010, 10:10 AM   #15 (permalink)
Squier-Meister
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mooresville,In
Age: 46
Posts: 289
Default

RH Factor Guitars has a Tele kit complete with MM body and neck Tone rider PUPs,a compklete kit for 395,that is a good deal.My first partscaster was over 600 in parts with no finish yet.
Bullitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GuitarFetish.com questions marcom1234 Squier Stratocasters 12 05-03-2010 05:18 PM

» Random Photos
T's Family
T-Bodz Terry B.
T's Family
» Recent Threads
Title, Username, & Date
Go to first new post NAD - well, last week
Porrig
Today 01:17 PM
Go to first new post Telemaster Nearing...
czook
Yesterday 05:20 PM
Go to first new post block length
justneal
Today 09:50 AM
Go to first new post AXL In The Workshop Video
tjnugent
02-07-2012 04:06 PM
electronics replacement...
horax
Today 12:53 PM
NGD - surf / surf
JapaneseBullets
02-08-2012 02:05 PM
Tell me about this...
stratkat
02-08-2012 10:44 AM
Who's your "well kept...
DUSTER44T
02-05-2012 11:35 AM
Hello from Northern CA
broomhandle
Yesterday 08:42 PM
WTS: Fender Mustang II
richieryan
01-12-2012 02:37 PM
» Sponsored Links
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:04 PM.
 


Design by: vBulletin Skins Zone
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2
The words Fender®, Squier® Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
Squier-Talk.com is an independent, member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
© 2009 All rights reserved.

Strat-Talk.com is not responsible for the content posted by private individuals on this website. The views expressed herein are solely the opinions of the individuals that produced them and not necessarily the views of the owner of this website.